“The 2010 Midterm Elections and the Youth Vote”
word count: 1202
After the G.O.P. swept the house in the 2010 midterm elections, U.S. citizens throughout the nation were left scratching their heads. One of the prime topics on everyone’s mind was the impact of the youth vote, and whether it really made a difference or not.
It appears that the youth vote did make a difference.
The turnout for the 2008 presidential elections was 51.1% of eligible youth ages 18-29, whereas the turnout for the 2010 midterms was 20.9%. If as many youth would have voted in the midterm elections as did in the 2008 presidentials, the vote would have been strongly swayed in favor of the Democrats. Since young people gravitate towards the left wing, according to political analyst William John Cox, if they do not come out to vote this greatly affects the chances of the Democrats winning.
Obama had a special connection with the youth in the 2008 presidential elections, since so many youth were inspired by his ambitious goals to revive our country economically, politically and socially. Specifically, Obama promised a reform from the “broken politics in Washington and the failed policies of George W. Bush.” (CBS News, 2008) Obama’s speech skills also had a large impact on youth trust:
“I’m asking you to believe. Not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington … I’m asking you to believe in yours,” Obama said.
Obama’s tone in itself was promising and inspirational, leading the youth to loyally rally in his favor in hopes that he would reform areas that affected them such as financial education reforms such as access to more loans and grants.
“I had more hope for Obama in 2008, now I am not so sure about Obama’s economic policies and the people he has working on his economic policies,” James Brooks, 23-year old voter, stated.
Obama indeed appears to have taken on too large a burden, and the youth have become defeated after realizing he may not be able to facilitate them like he promised in 2008.
“One third of the young people came to blame Obama himself for failing to deliver on his promises … the economy sucked, jobs evaporated, college tuition increased, coal slurry continued to spill into mountain streams and oil gushed into the Gulf of Mexico,” William John Cox said.
Since the youth is provided with so much varying political information through media, it is often hard for them to filter this information and make informed decisions concerning politics. This makes the jobs of campaigners and youth vote activists difficult, but pertinent. Many youth seem jaded and confused due to this overload of information:
“I am a bit naïve and confused about politics,” Grace Pollioni, 19, said.
"Honestly, I don't really care enough about the elections to get out and vote. Maybe I would if there were something in it for me, but I don't think that there's much anyone has actually been doing,” stated a 20-year-old male in the Little Italy area of New York City.
The youth vote is important for Democrats because older voters, who make up the majority, statistically tend to split up their votes between the Republican and Democratic parties, whereas youth voters are more likely to vote solid Democrat. Therefore, if youth voters do not come out, the Democrats are sure to suffer severely, as we saw in the 2010 midterms.
Heather Smith of “Rock the Vote” expressed the importance of the youth vote: “These young people are willing to participate and be active by nature, but they are not going to show up unless they are invited.” The youth need to feel “invited” since most of them have so much on their plate and so many obligations to fulfill in order to set the stage for their futures.
Keli Goff, political activist and author of Party Crashing, in five words, summed up an example of the importance of young people actually turning out:
“Florida in the 2000 election.”
The 2000 presidential race between George W. Bush and Al Gore was the closest election since 1876, and if more youth had voted in Florida the election probably would have gone in favor of Gore. With only 35% of the youth voting, an increase in this percentage would have made a significant impact.
This puts pressure on candidates to make sure their campaigns relate to and reach the youth in an attention-grabbing way.
“The Democratic party should recognize that young voters are the best hope for the future of democracy,” William John Cox said.
The youth have always been an integral part of our political structure since they are essentially blank slates with fresh views. Older generations are concerned with the youth because they impact the vote in such a heavily Democratic way, and sometimes are not fully educated as to the affect they are really having on our society. This is why it is important to educate the youth, making them less of a danger since they will make educated decisions if they are aware of current issues in a non-biased light.
“I find that the youth vote is active, but not accurate. They don’t understand what they are voting for, it’s very much on the surface,” Jesse, a 22-year-old student and intern from Los Angeles, stated.
If even youth themselves agree that they do not understand what they are voting for, we know it is an issue that must be addressed by organizations such as “Rock the Vote” and other political groups concerned with the youth.
Although it is important to vie for the attention of the youth, it is a sad truth that is often hard to catch their interest:
“… Most youth are generally apathetic about mainstream politics since it doesn’t seem to have much of an impact on their everyday lives. To the extent youth do get involved, they are typically more left or right than in the middle since those that get attracted at that age are generally caught up on the basis of an issue,” Gary Meisel, a former Harvard University student circa 1972 who worked on the Hubert Humphrey campaign, said.
With 97% of the youth using tools such as Facebook, Twitter and FourSquare, social media has become the prime way to reach them on a practical level. Social media allows the youth to communicate with each other, rather than fall victim to the propaganda often involved in corporate media:
“Most important, with their ability to instantly communicate with each other using the Internet, text messaging and social networks, young people are less vulnerable to being manipulated by the corporate media,” William John Cox said.
This aggregation of relevant and relatable political information makes knowledge easily accessible to this generation, leading them to make more practical, educated decisions than earlier generations, according to William John Cox. Although the youth vote decreased during this midterm election, it is hopeful that more youth will turn out for the next presidential elections. Social media can be overwhelming, but if the youth are able to filter the information properly, media tools can be very useful in terms of making political decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment